The undecidability of the spectral gap implies fundamental limits on predicting macroscopic quantum phenomena
Is it true that the undecidability of the spectral gap implies fundamental limits on predicting macroscopic quantum phenomena?
Yes. Recent findings in quantum many-body physics confirm that fundamental properties like the spectral gap, phase diagrams, and thermalization are undecidable or uncomputable, establishing deep limitations on predicting macroscopic quantum phenomena.
Verdict: SUPPORTED · 5 sources for, 0 against · Last checked
The claim connects the undecidability of the spectral gap and related quantum undecidability results to fundamental predictive limits on macroscopic quantum systems. Papers [0], [1], [2], [5], and [6] all directly support this by demonstrating that properties such as thermalization, renormalization group flows, phase diagrams, and thermodynamic limit observables are uncomputable or undecidable. There are no papers contradicting this claim, making the verdict SUPPORTED.
Get citation
N, S. & K, M. (2021). Undecidability in quantum thermalization.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25053-0
See more details
Get citation
JD, W., E, O., & TS, C. (2022). Uncomputably complex renormalisation group flows.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35179-4
Get citation
J, B., TS, C., & JD, W. (2021). Uncomputability of phase diagrams.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20504-6
Get citation
J, B., TS, C., A, L., D, P., & MM, W. (2018). Size-driven quantum phase transitions.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1705042114
Get citation
H, F., O, F., & SO, S. (2024). Certified algorithms for equilibrium states of local quantum Hamiltonians.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51592-3
Receipt History
Challenge the receipt
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work