trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
The scope of negation changes when a stressed word is present within a sentence
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against

The scope and interpretation of negation within a sentence are influenced by focal stress and prosodic cues.

Evidence for · 2
2014 · cited by 7
Paper 4 states that negation has both a scope and a focus within that scope, which can change interpretation and prominence.
See more details
The analysis

The claim specifies that the scope of negation changes in the presence of a stressed word. Paper 4 explicitly defines negation as having a scope and a focus (the part most prominently or explicitly negated). Paper 8 shows how prosodic contours and accents disambiguate scopal interactions involving negation. Therefore, the evidence directly supports the claim that prominence or stressed elements affect negation.

More for · 1
2024 · cited by 4
Paper 8 demonstrates that prosody and stress/accents play a direct role in distinguishing scopal readings of sentences containing negation.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8104 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt