trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
The replication crisis in psychology was identified in the early 2010s.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
4 sources for · 0 against

Multiple authoritative reference works and academic texts consistently state that the replication crisis in psychology and the broader social sciences came to prominence and was identified in the early 2010s.

Evidence for · 4
cited by 0
Reference article covering this claim directly
See more details
How claims like this are judged

Judged against reference works: claims of this kind are settled by the historical reference record, not journal abstracts.

More for · 3
2018 · cited by 0
Mentions non-replicable results and cites a 2014 paper in embodied cognition/social psychology.
cited by 0
Refers to social and personality psychology as being in the crosshairs of the replication crisis starting around 2010.
2022 · cited by 0
Identifies social and personality psychology as the subfield in the crosshairs of the replication crisis from 2010 onward.
Everything we examined (16)
  1. Wikipedia: Replication crisisreferencesupports
  2. Wikipedia: Ego depletionreferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  3. Book: Conceptual and Historical Issues in Psychologyreferencesupportsnot shown: a book whose author and subject did not establish authority here
  4. Book: The Heredity Hoaxreferencesupportsnot shown: a book whose author and subject did not establish authority here
  5. Book: Psychopathologyreferencesupportsnot shown: a book whose author and subject did not establish authority here
  6. Book: The Development of the High Ability Childreferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  7. Book: Psychoanalysis and the New Rhetoricreferencesupportsnot shown: a book whose author and subject did not establish authority here
  8. Book: Conceptual and Historical Issues in Psychologyreferencesupportsnot shown: a book whose author and subject did not establish authority here
  9. Oxford University Press: The Oxford handbook of compassion sciencereferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  10. Oxford University Press: Oxford textbook of global public healthreferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  11. OpenAIRE: Adjusting Sample Sizes for Different Categories of Embodied Cognition Researchpeer-reviewedsupports
  12. OpenAIRE: What limitations are reported in short articles in social and personality psychology? Postdoctoral Research Fellow PhD Studentpeer-reviewedsupports
  13. OpenAIRE: What limitations are reported in short articles in social and personality psychology?peer-reviewedsupports
  14. OpenAIRE: A data generated framework for the use of research methods in psychological research: a multi-method explorationpeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  15. OpenAIRE: Ayo, Bisexual Checkpeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  16. OpenAIRE: La influencia del contexto en la racionalidad del proceso de toma de decisiones estratégicas en organizaciones de saludpeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7505 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt