trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

The rate of linguistic drift can be measured quantitatively

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
5 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that the rate of linguistic drift can be measured quantitatively?

Yes. Multiple quantitative studies demonstrate that linguistic drift and lexical evolution can be reliably measured using statistical models, corpus data, and phylogenetic methods.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 5 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The retrieved papers consistently apply quantitative methods (such as corpus analysis, statistical regression, and phylogenetic modeling) to measure rates of language change and lexical replacement, strongly supporting the claim.

Evidence for · 5
2007
Get citation
Pagel, M., Atkinson, Q., & Meade, A. (2007). Frequency of word-use predicts rates of lexical evolution throughout Indo-European history. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06176

See more details
More for · 4
2016
Get citation
Vejdemo, S., Hörberg, T., & Komarova, N. (2016). Semantic Factors Predict the Rate of Lexical Replacement of Content Words. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147924

2014
Get citation
V, B., V, S., V, S., & S, W. (2014). Universals versus historical contingencies in lexical evolution.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.0841

2019
Get citation
Starostin, G. (2019). Chinese basic lexicon from a diachronic perspective: implications for lexicostatistics and glottochronology. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.31826/jlr-2019-171-213

2023
Get citation
Pasquini, M., Serva, M., & Vergni, D. (2023). Gradual Modifications and Abrupt Replacements: Two Stochastic Lexical Ingredients of Language Evolution. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00471

Related receipts

What does the evidence say?

The retrieved papers consistently apply quantitative methods (such as corpus analysis, statistical regression, and phylogenetic modeling) to measure rates of language change and lexical replacement, strongly supporting the claim.

Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 9204 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work