trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

The pH at the equivalence point of a titration is not always seven.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that the pH at the equivalence point of a titration is not always seven?

Yes. Chemical principles dictate that the pH at the equivalence point of a titration depends on the strengths of the reacting acid and base, meaning it is not universally equal to seven.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 2 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim is a specific, empirical, well-established chemical fact: the equivalence point pH depends on the nature of the acid and base being titrated (e.g., weak acid-strong base titrations have equivalence points above pH 7). Papers 2 and 5 both support the principle that equivalence point pH varies according to the specific chemical system.

Evidence for · 2
2007
Get citation
Cortes, M. S., Ramos, L. A., & Cavalheiro, É. T. G. (2007). TITULAÇÕES ESPECTROFOTOMÉTRICAS DE SISTEMAS ÁCIDO-BASE UTILIZANDO EXTRATO DE FLORES CONTENDO ANTOCIANINAS. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422007000400045

See more details
More for · 1
1963
Get citation
Stokes, R. (1963). Equivalence Points and Inflexion Points in Acid-Base Titration Curves. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1071/ch9630759

Related receipts
Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8104 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work