trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

The monotone hazard rate assumption ensures uniqueness and tractability in mechanism design

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that the monotone hazard rate assumption ensures uniqueness and tractability in mechanism design?

Yes. Economic literature in mechanism design frequently relies on the monotone hazard rate assumption to guarantee analytical tractability and well-behaved revenue-maximizing mechanisms.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 2 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The retrieved papers include studies in auction and mechanism design (such as papers [2] and [5]) that explicitly invoke the monotone hazard rate assumption to achieve mathematical tractability, bounds, and equilibria. No papers contradict this principle.

Evidence for · 2
2017
Get citation
Liu, S. & Psomas, A. (2017). On the Competition Complexity of Dynamic Mechanism Design. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611975031.131

See more details
More for · 1
2014
Get citation
Conitzer, V. & Vidali, A. (2014). Mechanism Design for Scheduling with Uncertain Execution Time. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v28i1.8793

Receipt History
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7305 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work