trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

The membrane potential is restored to resting state after hyperpolarization via ion transport

the verdict
COMMON KNOWLEDGE
Legacy classification; evidence review pending
Recorded sources
no sources on either side

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that the membrane potential is restored to resting state after hyperpolarization via ion transport?

Restoration of the resting membrane potential following hyperpolarization is a fundamental physiological concept governed by ion transport and channel dynamics, requiring no external citation.

Verdict: COMMON KNOWLEDGE · 0 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim states that the membrane potential is restored to its resting state after hyperpolarization via ion transport. This is a foundational, well-established principle of cellular electrophysiology (involving mechanisms like the Na+/K+-ATPase pump and ion permeabilities) that qualifies as common knowledge, requiring no specific literature citation.

What does the evidence say?

The claim states that the membrane potential is restored to its resting state after hyperpolarization via ion transport. This is a foundational, well-established principle of cellular electrophysiology (involving mechanisms like the Na+/K+-ATPase pump and ion permeabilities) that qualifies as common knowledge, requiring no specific literature citation.

Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → COMMON KNOWLEDGE · 9504 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work