trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

The kelvin is defined by fixing the numerical value of the Boltzmann constant

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that the kelvin is defined by fixing the numerical value of the Boltzmann constant?

Yes. The kelvin is indeed defined by fixing the exact numerical value of the Boltzmann constant, following the International System of Units (SI) redefinition.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

How claims like this are judged

Judged against reference works: claims of this kind are settled by reference works, not journal abstracts.

Evidence for · 3
Reference article covering this claim directly
Get citation
Wikipedia: Kelvin. (n.d.). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelvin

See more details
More for · 2
Reference article covering this claim directly
Get citation
Wikipedia: Boltzmann constant. (n.d.). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boltzmann_constant

2020
Confirms the kelvin is redefined by fundamental physical constants including the Boltzmann constant.
Get citation
Shisong, L., Qing, W., Wei, Z., & Songling, H. (2020). IEEE Trans.Instrum.Measur.: From μ 0 to e : A Survey of Major Impacts for Electrical Measurements in Recent SI Revision. IEEE Trans.Instrum.Measur.. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2020.3010351

Related receipts
Receipt History
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7505 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work