trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio measures the economic value of a health intervention.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
16 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio measures the economic value of a health intervention?

Yes. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) is a standard statistic used in health economics to measure the economic value and cost-effectiveness of medical interventions by comparing relative costs and health outcomes.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 16 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

How claims like this are judged

Judged against reference works: claims of this kind are settled by reference works, not journal abstracts.

Evidence for · 16
Reference article covering this claim directly
Get citation
Wikipedia: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. (n.d.). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incremental_cost-effectiveness_ratio

See more details
More for · 15
Reference article covering this claim directly
Get citation
Wikipedia: Cost-effectiveness analysis. (n.d.). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost-effectiveness_analysis

Reference article covering this claim directly
Get citation
Wikipedia: Comparative effectiveness research. (n.d.). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparative_effectiveness_research

2012
Discusses incremental cost and incremental effect as ratio measures in economic analysis.
Get citation
John Wiley & Sons: Economic analysis in health care. (2012). John Wiley & Sons. https://archive.org/details/economicanalysis0000unse_v4k9

1999
Refers to the determination of cost-effectiveness ratios and marginal cost-effectiveness for medical endeavors.
Get citation
Aspen Publishers: Issues in cost accounting for health care organizations. (1999). Aspen Publishers. https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780834210103_2

2025
Refers to assessing costs and cost-effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy interventions.
Get citation
Horne, R., Sabin, C., Chalder, T., Cooper, V., Campbell, L., & Glendinning, E. (2025). Programme Grants for Applied Research: Supporting antiretroviral therapy uptake and adherence: the SUPA research programme and RCT. Programme Grants for Applied Research. https://doi.org/10.3310/KPPW8401

2022
Mentions parallel economic analysis investigating clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.
Get citation
Bruce, J., Mazuquin, B., Mistry, P., Rees, S., Canaway, A., & Hossain, A. (2022). Health Technology Assessment: Exercise to prevent shoulder problems after breast cancer surgery: the PROSPER RCT. Health Technology Assessment. https://doi.org/10.3310/JKNZ2003

2020
Evaluates cost-effectiveness and efficient techniques of colorectal cancer screening.
Get citation
F, K., B, N., F, M., M, Y., H, A., & A, M. (2020). Risk Management and Healthcare Policy: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy. https://www.dovepress.com/cost-effectiveness-analysis-of-colorectal-cancer-screening-a-systemati-peer-reviewed-article-RMHP

2023
States the ICER is calculated to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of vaccination strategies.
Get citation
Zhou, H., Zhou, H., Ding, N., Han, X., Zhang, H., & Liu, Z. (2023). Frontiers in Public Health: Cost-effectiveness analysis of vaccination against COVID-19 in China. Frontiers in Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1037556

2012
Discusses comparative clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of surgical procedures.
Get citation
Ramsay, C., Pickard, R., Robertson, C., Close, A., Vale, L., & Armstrong, N. (2012). Health Technology Assessment: Systematic review and economic modelling of the relative clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for removal of the prostate in men with localised prostate cancer. Health Technology Assessment. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta16410

2020
Describes health economic evaluations to determine if interventions are cost-effective.
Get citation
Francis, N. A., Gillespie, D., White, P., Bates, J., Lowe, R., & Sewell, B. (2020). Health Technology Assessment: C-reactive protein point-of-care testing for safely reducing antibiotics for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the PACE RCT. Health Technology Assessment. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta24150

2012
Notes that ICER represents the additional cost per unit of outcome gained, serving as a popular methodology in health economics.
Get citation
OpenAIRE: Median-Based Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER). (2012). OpenAIRE. https://doi.org/10.1080/15598608.2012.695571

1995
Exemplifies how incremental cost-effectiveness ratios estimate the economic value and trade-offs of health interventions.
Get citation
OpenAIRE: Economic evaluation using mathematical models: the case of misoprostol prophylaxis.. (1995). OpenAIRE. https://explore.openaire.eu/

2 recorded entries grouped as this source

Additional records of the same source are shown below. They are not counted as additional sources.

2006
Explains that the ICER gives an estimate of the cost and effect tradeoff of implementing a health program.
Get citation
OpenAIRE: BLOOD CONSERVATION IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ELECTIVE PRIMARY TOTAL HIP JOINT ARTHROPLASTY: AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION. (2006). OpenAIRE. https://explore.openaire.eu/

2020
Confirms ICER is routinely used by health technology assessment agencies to summarize economic evaluations of health interventions.
Get citation
OpenAIRE: Calculating and Interpreting ICERs and Net Benefit. (2020). OpenAIRE. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-020-00914-6

2011
Examines whether preventive health interventions are cost-effective using incremental cost ratios.
Get citation
OpenAIRE: Public health and prevention in Europe: is it cost-effective?. (2011). OpenAIRE. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-8893.2011.00052.x

2024
Introduces the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio as a tool for economic evaluation and decision making in health.
Get citation
OpenAIRE: UNA REVISIÓN DE MÉTODOS DE EVALUACIÓN ECONÓMICA EN SALUD. (2024). OpenAIRE. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13762818

Receipt History
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7505 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work