trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

The human liver is capable of regeneration

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
5 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that the human liver is capable of regeneration?

Yes. Extensive clinical and biological evidence confirms that the human liver possesses a remarkable capacity for structural and functional regeneration following injury or surgical resection.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 5 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim is a well-established medical and biological fact. Multiple retrieved papers directly discuss mechanisms, clinical procedures, and metabolic dynamics associated with human liver regeneration, providing overwhelming support without any contradictory evidence.

Evidence for · 5
2026
Get citation
SY, T., D, J., C, A., & SN, N. (2026). Therapeutic priming of liver regeneration: from mechanisms to <i>ex vivo</i> machine perfusion.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3389/frtra.2026.1841091

See more details
More for · 4
2026
Get citation
U, K., A, L., LB, B., ESS, H., KH, A., S, R., JR, N., FV, M., & C, L. (2026). Hyperpolarized MRI Detects Increased [1-<sup>13</sup>C]Pyruvate Metabolism in Early Liver Regeneration.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.70340

2026
Get citation
Q, Y., C, X., H, C., G, Z., F, Z., Z, W., Y, L., J, Z., H, C., J, X., W, C., J, Y., Y, Z., H, L., H, L., Y, Y., R, L., & J, Z. (2026). NAT10 deficiency in aging drives impaired liver regeneration by disrupting PARP10 in an ac4C-dependent manner.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2026.0244

2026
Get citation
D, Z., J, K., Y, J., S, Z., P, C., H, W., X, L., X, G., Z, J., P, W., C, W., D, Z., W, Q., & L, Z. (2026). Knockout of acod1 promotes liver regeneration after hepatectomy by promoting fatty acid mobilization.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2026.154289

2026
Get citation
Y, R., H, Z., K, H., P, Y., D, F., W, M., & E, M. (2026). Enhancing future liver remnant hypertrophy: innovative preoperative strategies and emerging technologies.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.21037/tgh-2025-151

What does the evidence say?

The claim is a well-established medical and biological fact. Multiple retrieved papers directly discuss mechanisms, clinical procedures, and metabolic dynamics associated with human liver regeneration, providing overwhelming support without any contradictory evidence.

Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7504 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work