✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
The Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem applies to median voting mechanisms.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against
Is it true that the Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem applies to median voting mechanisms?
Yes. The Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem and related strategy-proofness results heavily intersect with median voting mechanisms, particularly within single-peaked preference domains where anonymous and strategy-proof rules are characterized as median rules.
Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked
The analysis
The provided literature discusses social choice theory, strategy-proofness, and median-based voting rules under single-peaked and generalized single-peaked domains. Papers 1, 10, and 11 explicitly analyze strategy-proof social choice rules and link them to median-based mechanisms, supporting the claim.
Evidence for · 3
Get citation
Sreedurga, G., Sadhukhan, S., Roy, S., & Narahari, Y. (2022). Characterization of Group-Fair Social Choice Rules under Single-Peaked Preferences. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.07984
See more details
More for · 2
Anonymity and strategy-proofness on a domain of single-peaked and single-dipped preferences
Get citation
Gallo, O. (2024). Anonymity and strategy-proofness on a domain of single-peaked and single-dipped preferences..
Get citation
Rachidi, T. (2025). Optimal Voting Mechanisms on Generalized Single-Peaked Domains. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20220133
Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7904 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any
personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check
or guarantee a response time.
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work