trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
The Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem applies to median voting mechanisms.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
3 sources for · 0 against

The Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem and related strategy-proofness results heavily intersect with median voting mechanisms, particularly within single-peaked preference domains where anonymous and strategy-proof rules are characterized as median rules.

Evidence for · 3
2022 · cited by 3
Paper 1 notes that under single-peaked preferences, strategy-proof deterministic rules must be min-max rules and anonymity leads specifically to median rules, implicating the Gibbard-Satterthwaite framework.
See more details
The analysis

The provided literature discusses social choice theory, strategy-proofness, and median-based voting rules under single-peaked and generalized single-peaked domains. Papers 1, 10, and 11 explicitly analyze strategy-proof social choice rules and link them to median-based mechanisms, supporting the claim.

More for · 2
Anonymity and strategy-proofness on a domain of single-peaked and single-dipped preferences
2024 · cited by 0
Paper 10 discusses strategy-proof rules on single-peaked domains where the median is computed directly, interacting with strategy-proofness theorems.
2025 · cited by 0
Paper 11 studies welfare-maximizing voting rules satisfying strategy-proofness and anonymity on generalized single-peaked domains derived from median spaces.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7904 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt