trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

The distinction between actual and potential infinity is philosophically significant

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
13 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that the distinction between actual and potential infinity is philosophically significant?

Yes. Multiple scholarly sources and reference works confirm that the distinction between actual and potential infinity has been a central and debated concept throughout the history of philosophy, metaphysics, and mathematics.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 13 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

Judged against the evidence record for claims of this kind.

Evidence for · 13
Reference article covering this claim directly
Get citation
Wikipedia: Infinity. (n.d.). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinity

See more details
More for · 12
Covers Aristotle's potential infinity and related philosophical distinctions.
Get citation
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Infinity. (n.d.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/infinity/

1993
Refers to the distinction between actual and potential infinity.
Get citation
Dartmouth: Infinity. (1993). Dartmouth. https://archive.org/details/lccn_93-18025

2001
Mentions the distinction between actual and potential infinity in metaphysics.
Get citation
Pablo, I. A. (2001). Routledge: Dictionary of world philosophy. Routledge. https://archive.org/details/dictionaryofworl0000iann

2011
Notes that the distinction between actual and potential infinities was familiar in philosophical clarification.
Get citation
Oxford University Press: The Oxford handbook of Wittgenstein. (2011). Oxford University Press. https://archive.org/details/oxfordhandbookof0000unse_w3i1

2005
References philosophical formulations of actual and ideal/potential entities.
Get citation
Oxford University Press: The Oxford companion to philosophy. (2005). Oxford University Press. https://archive.org/details/oxfordcompaniont0000unse_f5n3

2008
Mentions the distinction between actual and potential infinite in American philosophy.
Get citation
Routledge: American philosophy : an encyclopedia. (2008). Routledge. https://archive.org/details/americanphilosop0000unse_h0o6

2000
Discusses how the distinction between potential and actual infinity arises in mathematics and philosophy.
Get citation
OpenAIRE: Choice Sequences and Spreads. (2000). OpenAIRE. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198505242.003.0004

2007
Emphasizes the contrast between potential and actual infinity as a major topic in mathematics and philosophy.
Get citation
OpenAIRE: Infinity. (2007). OpenAIRE. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-044451541-4/50017-8

2019
Examines Leibniz's distinction between actual and potential infinity as a central philosophical concept.
Get citation
OpenAIRE: Introducing the Main Characters. (2019). OpenAIRE. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190907327.003.0002

2025
Explores the philosophical and epistemological significance of the distinction between potential and actual infinity.
Get citation
OpenAIRE: ETHICS OF ROBOTS. (2025). OpenAIRE. https://doi.org/10.46793/humanologyi-1.075d

2017
Covers historical and philosophical attitudes to infinity, highlighting Aristotle's distinction.
Get citation
OpenAIRE: 3. Historical views of infinity. (2017). OpenAIRE. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198755234.003.0004

1993
Investigates Zeno's paradoxes and Aristotle's distinction between actual and potential infinity.
Get citation
OpenAIRE: A dialogue on Zeno's paradox of Achilles and the tortoise. (1993). OpenAIRE. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00710813

What does the evidence say?

Judged against the evidence record for claims of this kind.

Receipt History
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7505 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work