trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

The Celestial Ephemeris Pole has a precise mathematical definition

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that the Celestial Ephemeris Pole has a precise mathematical definition?

Yes. Scientific literature and International Astronomical Union definitions provide precise mathematical and operational frameworks for the Celestial Ephemeris Pole and its successor.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The retrieved papers document the precise definitions, extensions, and updates regarding the Celestial Ephemeris Pole (CEP) within geodesy and astronomy. Papers [2], [5], and [7] explicitly discuss the mathematical definitions and reference frames associated with the CEP, supporting the claim that it has a precise definition.

Evidence for · 3
Definition of the Celestial Ephemeris Pole and the Celestial Ephemeris Origin
2000
Get citation
Capitaine, N. (2000). Definition of the Celestial Ephemeris Pole and the Celestial Ephemeris Origin. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0252921100000245

See more details
More for · 2
Observations of the Celestial Ephemeris Pole
1995
Get citation
Gross, R. (1995). Observations of the Celestial Ephemeris Pole. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1539299600011084

New Definition for the Celestial Pole and the Celestial Origin in the ICRS
2002
Get citation
Capitaine, N. (2002). New Definition for the Celestial Pole and the Celestial Origin in the ICRS. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1539299600012971

Related receipts
Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7904 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work