trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

The Andean Cordilleras formed during specific geological eras

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
5 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that the Andean Cordilleras formed during specific geological eras?

Yes. Multiple geological and paleontological studies demonstrate that the Andean Cordilleras formed through distinct, punctuated tectonic phases across specific geological eras such as the Cretaceous, Paleogene, Eocene, and Miocene.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 5 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim is specific and empirical, dealing with the geological timing of the formation of the Andean Cordilleras. All retrieved papers that discuss the timing of Andean uplift consistently point to specific, episodic tectonic phases across various Cenozoic and Mesozoic eras (e.g., Late Cretaceous, Eocene, Miocene). Therefore, the verdict is SUPPORTED with zero contradicting papers.

Evidence for · 5
2021
Get citation
Boschman, L. & Condamine, F. (2021). Mountain radiations are not only rapid and recent: Ancient diversification of South American frog and lizard families related to Paleogene Andean orogeny and Cenozoic climate variations. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.24.441240

See more details
More for · 4
2019
Get citation
Mackaman‐Lofland, C., Horton, B., Fuentes, F., Constenius, K., & Stockli, D. (2019). Mesozoic to Cenozoic retroarc basin evolution during changes in tectonic regime, southern Central Andes (31–33°S): Insights from zircon U-Pb geochronology. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSAMES.2018.10.004

2023
Get citation
Suriano, J., Lossada, A., Mahoney, J., Tedesco, A., Limarino, C., Giambiagi, L., Mazzitelli, M., Mescua, J., Lothari, L., & Quiroga, R. (2023). The southern extension of the Eocene Andean orogeny: New sedimentary record of the foreland basin in the southern Central Andes at 32° S. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1111/bre.12803

2018
Get citation
EM, S., MB, A., CG, M., KJW, M., JP, D., C, S., & MN, D. (2018). Andean surface uplift constrained by radiogenic isotopes of arc lavas.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03173-4

2023
Get citation
Pingel, H., Deeken, A., Coutand, I., Alonso, R., Riller, U., Sobel, E., Cottle, J., & Strecker, M. (2023). Cenozoic Exhumation and Deformation of the Intermontane Pastos Chicos Basin in the Southern Central Andes: Implications for the Tectonic Evolution of the Andean Plateau (Puna) and the Eastern Cordillera Between 23° and 24°S, NW Argentina. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022TC007487

What does the evidence say?

The claim is specific and empirical, dealing with the geological timing of the formation of the Andean Cordilleras. All retrieved papers that discuss the timing of Andean uplift consistently point to specific, episodic tectonic phases across various Cenozoic and Mesozoic eras (e.g., Late Cretaceous, Eocene, Miocene). Therefore, the verdict is SUPPORTED with zero contradicting papers.

Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8604 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work