The ampersand is formally classified as a letter in the standard Latin alphabet

the verdict

REFUTED

the evidence says no

Recorded sources

0 sources for · 2 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Is it true that the ampersand is formally classified as a letter in the standard Latin alphabet?

No. The ampersand is a logogram derived from a ligature, not a formally classified letter of the standard modern Latin alphabet, which consists of 26 core letters.

Verdict: REFUTED · 0 sources for, 2 against · Last checked 4 Aug 2026

How claims like this are judged

Judged against reference works: claims of this kind are settled by reference works, not journal abstracts.

Evidence against · 2

Wikipedia: Ampersand

Reference article covering this claim directly

Get citation

Wikipedia: Ampersand. (n.d.). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ampersand

See more details

More against · 1

Wikipedia: Latin alphabet

Reference article covering this claim directly

Get citation

Wikipedia: Latin alphabet. (n.d.). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_alphabet

Related receipts

Is it true that Non-Latin alphabet letters are used to describe the shape of objects? SUPPORTED related question, same topic
Is it true that the word alphabet is derived from Greek letters? SUPPORTED related question, same topic
Is it true that the letter W is called double U because the Latin letters U and V were once interchangeable? SUPPORTED related question, same topic
Is it true that the order of letters in the alphabet has no known systematic rationale? PARTIAL LEAN related question, same topic

Receipt History

first checked04 Aug 2026

judged → REFUTED · 1004 Aug 2026

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: request a receipt review Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work