trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

The Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales measure fundamental emotional systems derived from animal brain research

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
8 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales measure fundamental emotional systems derived from animal brain research?

Yes. Multiple peer-reviewed scientific studies confirm that the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales (ANPS) were designed to measure fundamental emotional systems based on Jaak Panksepp's affective neuroscience research into cross-species and animal brain systems.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 8 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

How claims like this are judged

Judged against reference works: claims of this kind are settled by reference works, not journal abstracts.

Evidence for · 8
2021
States the ANPS were constructed to measure Jaak Panksepp’s cross-species primary emotional systems derived from animal research.
Get citation
Marengo, D., Davis, K. L., Gradwohl, G. Ö., & Montag, C. (2021). Scientific Reports: A meta-analysis on individual differences in primary emotional systems and Big Five personality traits. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84366-8

See more details
More for · 7
2019
Confirms the ANPS assesses primary emotional systems derived from Jaak Panksepp's Affective Neuroscience Theory.
Get citation
Christian, M., L., D. K., B., L. L., & Goran, K. (2019). Open Psychology: A Serbian version of the ANPS and its link to the five-factor model of personality. Open Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1515/psych-2018-0019

2011
Notes the ANPS provides a personality assessment based on distinct affective systems identified by Panksepp.
Get citation
OpenAIRE: Spanish Validation of the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales. (2011). OpenAIRE. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_sjop.2011.v14.n2.38

2015
States the ANPS evaluates personality based on Panksepp's basic innate affective systems.
Get citation
OpenAIRE: Validation of the Italian Translation of the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales. (2015). OpenAIRE. https://doi.org/10.2466/08.09.pr0.116k13w4

2023
Notes the ANPS assesses neurobiologically defined primary emotional system activation.
Get citation
OpenAIRE: The Dutch Translation of the Brief Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales. (2023). OpenAIRE. https://doi.org/10.1027/2698-1866/a000035

2023
Repeats that the ANPS assesses neurobiologically defined primary emotional system activation.
Get citation
OpenAIRE: The Dutch Translation of the Brief Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales Primary Emotional Systems Predict Phenotypical Personality Traits. (2023). OpenAIRE. https://explore.openaire.eu/

2023
States personality theory is based on affective neuroscience research indicating affective neurobiological systems measured by the ANPS.
Get citation
OpenAIRE: Brief Form of the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales: Preliminary Psychometric Properties in a European Portuguese Community Sample. (2023). OpenAIRE. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941231202016

2015
Notes the ANPS was developed to measure the influence of basic affective systems on human temperamental variability.
Get citation
OpenAIRE: Social dominance and the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales. (2015). OpenAIRE. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.12.005

Receipt History
first checked06 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7506 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work