trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
The 9/11 terrorist attacks were planned by the United States government
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
0 sources for · 8 against

The evidence conclusively establishes that the 9/11 terrorist attacks were planned and perpetrated by the terrorist organization al-Qaeda, not the United States government.

Evidence against · 8
Wikipedia: September 11 attacks
cited by 0
Reference article covering this claim directly
See more details
How claims like this are judged

Judged against fact-checker rulings and reference works: claims of this kind are settled by the fact-checking record, not journal abstracts.

More against · 7
Greenhaven Publishing, LLC: Domestic terrorism
cited by 0
Notes attacks were centrally planned and coordinated by foreign entities.
Olive Branch Press: The new Pearl Harbor revisited : 9/11, the cover-up, and the exposé
2008 · cited by 0
Notes conspiracy theories claim it was an inside job, but confirms perpetrators were Arab.
Nomad Press: Terrorism : violence, intimidation, and solutions for peace
2017 · cited by 0
Identifies 9/11 as terrorist attacks.
Nomad Press: Terrorism : violence, intimidation, and solutions for peace
2017 · cited by 0
Identifies 9/11 as terrorist attacks.
Gale Group: History behind the headlines : the origins of conflicts worldwide
2001 · cited by 0
Notes extremists carried out the attacks.
Virgin [distributor]: The terror conspiracy : deception, 9/11, and the loss of liberty
2006 · cited by 0
Mentions allegations of 9/11 being allowed or a conspiracy, but refutes government planning.
OpenAIRE: The Political and Legal Status of Persons in the War on Terrorism
2004 · cited by 0
Identifies the attacks as committed by external organizations and persons.
Everything we examined (21) — 20 independent sources
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. The Washington Post: Analysis | President Trump's claim that foreigners are responsible for ...fact-checkerno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  2. Wikipedia: September 11 attacksreferencerefutes
  3. Book: The New Global Terrorismreferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  4. Greenhaven Publishing, LLC: Domestic terrorismreferencerefutes
  5. Columbia University Press: The evolution of the global terrorist threat : from 9/11 to Osama bin Laden's deathreferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  6. Olive Branch Press: The new Pearl Harbor revisited : 9/11, the cover-up, and the exposéreferencerefutes
  7. Nomad Press: Terrorism : violence, intimidation, and solutions for peacereferencesame source L7refutes
  8. Nomad Press: Terrorism : violence, intimidation, and solutions for peacereferencesame source L7refutes
  9. Gale Group: History behind the headlines : the origins of conflicts worldwidereferencerefutes
  10. Virgin [distributor]: The terror conspiracy : deception, 9/11, and the loss of libertyreferencerefutes
  11. Penguin Random House: Eleventh Dayreferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  12. Journal of Children's Orthopaedics: Airport metal detector activation is rare after posterior spinal fusion in children with scoliosispeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  13. Perspectives on Terrorism: Current and Emerging Threats of Homegrown Terrorism: The Case of the Boston Bombingspeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  14. Amnis: Anders Breivik et le « marxisme culturel » : Etats-Unis/Europepeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  15. Free University Journal of Asian Studies: Leadership in Jihadist Terrorist Organizationspeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  16. OpenAIRE: Jihadist Terrorist Plots in the United Statespeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  17. OpenAIRE: A Community-Level Comparison of Terrorism Movements in the United Statespeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  18. OpenAIRE: The Political and Legal Status of Persons in the War on Terrorismpeer-reviewedrefutes
  19. OpenAIRE: Cyber Terrorism: A Threat to National Securitypeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  20. OpenAIRE: Making Sense of the “Islamic Peril”: Journalism as Cultural Practicepeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  21. OpenAIRE: In the face of tragedy: Placing children's reactions to trauma in a new contextpeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked06 Aug 2026
judged → REFUTED · 006 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt