Syntactic depth and clause embedding serve as metrics to rate the processing complexity of English sentences.

the verdict

SUPPORTED

the evidence backs this

Recorded sources

4 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that syntactic depth and clause embedding serve as metrics to rate the processing complexity of English sentences?

Yes. Syntactic depth, clause embedding, and related structural measures are widely utilized across linguistic and computational studies as standard metrics to rate the processing complexity and difficulty of sentences.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 4 sources for, 0 against · Last checked 6 Aug 2026

The analysis

The retrieved papers consistently employ measures such as syntactic tree depth, embedded clause levels, and clause-based complexity metrics to assess linguistic difficulty and cognitive processing demands. No papers refute the claim.

Evidence for · 4

Syntactic complexity in legal translated texts and the use of plain English: a corpus-based study

2023

The study notes that complex nominal and hypotactic structures increase propositions per sentence, raising cognitive processing demands.

Get citation

Lin, X., Afzaal, M., & Aldayel, H. S. (2023). Syntactic complexity in legal translated texts and the use of plain English: a corpus-based study. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01485-x

See more details

More for · 3

Developing syntactic complexity and accuracy in EFL students’ essays through sentence combining

2025

Measures including clauses per T-unit and dependent clauses per clause are used as key dimensions of syntactic complexity.

Get citation

Jaya, S., Susyla, D., & Melati (2025). Developing syntactic complexity and accuracy in EFL students’ essays through sentence combining. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v6i2.4802

Syntactic complexity recognition and analysis in Chinese-English machine translation: A comparative study based on the BLSTM-CRF model

2025

The study utilizes average syntactic node depth and embedded clause levels as core indicators for evaluating syntactic complexity and processing difficulty.

Get citation

Tian, Y. (2025). Syntactic complexity recognition and analysis in Chinese-English machine translation: A comparative study based on the BLSTM-CRF model. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325721

Key predictors of proficiency in L2 writing: Syntactic, lexical complexity, and accuracy

2025

Measures such as dependent clauses per T-unit serve as primary indices of syntactic complexity in assessing writing performance.

Get citation

Park, S. (2025). Key predictors of proficiency in L2 writing: Syntactic, lexical complexity, and accuracy. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v12i3.42039

Related receipts

Is it true that syntactic complexity of sentences can be measured quantitatively in natural language processing? SUPPORTED related question, same topic
Is it true that complex syntactic sentences can be constructed without any subordinate or dependent clauses? SUPPORTED related question, same topic

What does the evidence say?

Receipt History

first checked06 Aug 2026

judged → SUPPORTED · 8406 Aug 2026

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: request a receipt review Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work