trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Sword swallowers perform the act without harming their bodies
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
0 sources for · 2 against

Evidence shows that sword swallowing carries distinct physical risks, including esophageal perforations, sore throats, and major gastrointestinal bleeding, refuting the claim that the act is performed without harming the body.

Evidence against · 2
2006 · cited by 10
This study evaluates sword swallowing and documents side effects such as sore throats, perforations of the esophagus, and major gastrointestinal bleeding.
See more details
The analysis

Papers [2] and [3] directly examine sword swallowing and document significant medical complications and physical harm resulting from the practice, such as esophageal perforations and gastrointestinal bleeding. Therefore, the claim that it is performed without harming the body is refuted.

More against · 1
2001 · cited by 8
This case report documents a severe esophageal perforation requiring surgical repair resulting directly from sword swallowing.
Everything we examined (7)
We also searched for evidence AGAINST this claim, not only for it.
  1. International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  2. ROS-Mediated Therapeutic Strategy in Chemo-/Radiotherapy of Head and Neck Cancer.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  3. Sword swallowing and its side effects.peer-reviewedrefutes
  4. Esophageal perforation in a sword swallower.peer-reviewedrefutes
  5. Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) in Neurocritical Patients: The Hidden Dialog of Brain and Infection.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  6. Esophageal Small Cell Carcinoma: From Bench Discoveries to Bedside Therapeutics.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  7. The Quest for Remote Viewingpeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked06 Aug 2026
judged → REFUTED · 1606 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt