trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Survey question wording introduces systematic bias based on positive or negative framing

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that survey question wording introduces systematic bias based on positive or negative framing?

Yes. Multiple studies demonstrate that survey question wording, including positive and negative framing, introduces systematic bias into respondent and model evaluations.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The retrieved papers include direct evidence demonstrating that question wording and positive or negative framing systematically bias survey and evaluation outcomes. Studies such as [0], [2], and [6] specifically highlight how framing and item formulation alter responses. None of the papers refute the claim. Thus, the verdict is SUPPORTED.

Evidence for · 3
The Focus of Judgment Effect: A Question Wording Effect Due to Hypothesis Confirnation Bias
1992
The study demonstrates how question wording and focusing mechanisms can introduce systematic bias into judgments and survey responses.
Get citation
Lehman, D. R., Krosnick, J. A., West, R. L., & Li, F. (1992). The Focus of Judgment Effect: A Question Wording Effect Due to Hypothesis Confirnation Bias. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292186005

See more details
More for · 2
When Wording Steers the Evaluation: Framing Bias in LLM judges
2026
The research shows that deliberate prompt framing using positive or negative constructions skews evaluations and introduces significant discrepancies.
Get citation
Hwang, Y., Lee, D., Kang, T., Lee, M., & Jung, K. (2026). When Wording Steers the Evaluation: Framing Bias in LLM judges. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.13537

Question Wording and Item Formulation
2016
The overview highlights item wording as a key factor governing self-report behavior that can bias survey data and inferences.
Get citation
Elson, M. (2016). Question Wording and Item Formulation. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/e4ktc

What does the evidence say?

The retrieved papers include direct evidence demonstrating that question wording and positive or negative framing systematically bias survey and evaluation outcomes. Studies such as [0], [2], and [6] specifically highlight how framing and item formulation alter responses. None of the papers refute the claim. Thus, the verdict is SUPPORTED.

Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8204 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work