✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Supernumerary rainbows are caused by interference between rays of light inside raindrops
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against
Is it true that Supernumerary rainbows are caused by interference between rays of light inside raindrops?
Yes. Supernumerary rainbows are indeed caused by the interference of light waves following internal reflection within raindrops, a phenomenon explained by wave optics and Airy theory.
Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked
The analysis
The retrieved literature consistently supports the wave-optical and interference-based mechanism of supernumerary rainbows. One study and 11 detail how interference and wave optics (as opposed to pure geometric optics) account for supernumerary bows, and one study discusses the interference phenomena of internal rays in spherical particles. No papers contradict the claim.
Evidence for · 3
Get citation
Kanamori, S., Fujiwara, K., Yoshinobu, T., Raytchev, B., Tamaki, T., & Kaneda, K. (2010). Physically Based Rendering of Rainbows under Various Atmospheric Conditions. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1109/PacificGraphics.2010.13
See more details
More for · 2
Get citation
JA, L. (2017). High-order rainbows of a spherical particle produced by near-grazing incident light.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.56.000g75
Get citation
Lee, R. L. (1997). Mie Theory, Airy Theory, and the Natural Rainbow. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1364/lcoa.1997.lmb.1
Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8004 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any
personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check
or guarantee a response time.
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work