trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Supernovae last for a characteristic duration of time

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
5 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that supernovae last for a characteristic duration of time?

Yes. Supernovae exhibit characteristic temporal behaviors, including distinct rise times, decline rates, and plateau phases that astronomers routinely measure and model to classify different types of stellar explosions.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 5 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The retrieved papers consistently demonstrate that supernovae follow characteristic durations, light curve timescales, plateau phases, and decline rates that can be systematically modeled and categorized across various types of supernovae. There is no contradictory evidence presented regarding whether supernovae have characteristic durations.

Evidence for · 5
The Type I Superluminous Supernova Catalog I: Light Curve Properties, Models, and Catalog Description
2024
Analyzes rise and decline timescales across a large catalog of supernovae.
Get citation
Gomez, S., Nicholl, M., Berger, E., Blanchard, P., Villar, V., Rest, S., Hosseinzadeh, G., Aamer, A., Ajay, Y., Athukoralalage, W., Coulter, D., Eftekhari, T., Fiore, A., Franz, N., Fox, O., Gagliano, A., Hiramatsu, D., Howell, D., Hsu, B., Karmen, M., Siebert, M., Konyves-T'oth, R., Kumar, H., McCully, C., Pellegrino, C., Pierel, J., Rest, A., & Wang, Q. (2024). The Type I Superluminous Supernova Catalog I: Light Curve Properties, Models, and Catalog Description..

See more details
More for · 4
2024
Models the plateau phase duration of Type II supernovae.
Get citation
Fang, Q., Maeda, K., Ye, H., Moriya, T., & Matsumoto, T. (2024). Diversity in Hydrogen-rich Envelope Mass of Type II Supernovae. I. Plateau Phase Light-curve Modeling. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad8b19

2018
Monitors the light curve and characteristic timescales of a specific supernova.
Get citation
Gangopadhyay, A., Gangopadhyay, A., Misra, K., Pastorello, A., Sahu, D., Tomasella, L., Tartaglia, L., Singh, M., Singh, M., Dastidar, R., Dastidar, R., Srivastav, S., Ochner, P., Brown, P., Anupama, G., Benetti, S., Cappellaro, E., Kumar, B., Kumar, B., & Pandey, S. (2018). SN 2015as: A low luminosity Type IIb supernova without an early light curve peak. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty478

2019
Examines light-curve timescales and shape properties to characterize supernova diversity.
Get citation
Chatzopoulos, E. & Tuminello, R. (2019). A Systematic Study of Superluminous Supernova Light-curve Models Using Clustering. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab0ae6

2024
Investigates the factors affecting the duration of the hydrogen recombination plateau phase.
Get citation
Matsumoto, T., Metzger, B. D., & Goldberg, J. A. (2024). Long Plateau Doth So: How Internal Heating Sources Affect Hydrogen-rich Supernova Light Curves. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad93a9

Related receipts

What does the evidence say?

The retrieved papers consistently demonstrate that supernovae follow characteristic durations, light curve timescales, plateau phases, and decline rates that can be systematically modeled and categorized across various types of supernovae. There is no contradictory evidence presented regarding whether supernovae have characteristic durations.

Receipt History
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8405 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work