trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Statistical proportion of negative elements matters more than absolute quantity in risk perception

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that statistical proportion of negative elements matters more than absolute quantity in risk perception?

Yes. Evidence from behavioral and decision-making research indicates that the proportional representation of negative elements heavily influences risk perception, often overriding absolute quantity due to psychological biases such as denominator neglect and ratio bias.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

Papers [2], [4], and [8] directly investigate how proportional information, ratios, frequencies, and framing formats impact risk perception and decision-making, supporting the claim that proportional relationships matter significantly in how humans evaluate risk. No papers refute this premise.

Evidence for · 3
From group diffusion to ratio bias: Effects of denominator and numerator salience on intuitive risk and likelihood judgments
2009
Demonstrates that risk and likelihood judgments are heavily influenced by the ratio structure, showing how numerator and denominator salience (such as proportions versus absolute numbers) shift perceived risk.
Get citation
Price, P. C. & Matthews, T. V. (2009). From group diffusion to ratio bias: Effects of denominator and numerator salience on intuitive risk and likelihood judgments. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500003971

See more details
More for · 2
Frequency or total number? A comparison of different presentation formats on risk perception during COVID-19
2022
Compares total-cases formats, frequencies, and proportions, finding that different presentation formats significantly alter people's perceived risk of COVID-19.
Get citation
Jie, Y. (2022). Frequency or total number? A comparison of different presentation formats
 on risk perception during COVID-19. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500009086

Systematic variation in proportion judgments: Spatial features impact adults' strategies and decisions.
2026
Shows that adults' proportional reasoning and risk-related decisions are systematically affected by how proportional information is framed and whether subcomponents are discrete or spatially separated.
Get citation
MA, H. & SC, L. (2026). Systematic variation in proportion judgments: Spatial features impact adults' strategies and decisions.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001903

Related receipts
Receipt History
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8105 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work