trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Static images can induce visual motion illusions due to peripheral drift effects

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
5 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that static images can induce visual motion illusions due to peripheral drift effects?

Yes. Multiple studies demonstrate that static images featuring specific luminance gradients and contrast patterns can induce compelling visual motion illusions, such as the peripheral drift effect.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 5 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim is a specific, empirically testable scientific proposition about visual perception. The provided literature includes foundational and recent studies (such as Kitaoka's peripheral drift illusion work, investigations into contrast-based visual latency, and research on static illusory expanding holes and the Rotating Snakes illusion) that consistently support the fact that static images can induce motion illusions via peripheral drift and related luminance mechanisms. There are no refuting papers.

Evidence for · 5
1999
Demonstrates that circularly repeating patches with sawtooth luminance gradients (static images) produce a sensation of motion in the visual periphery.
Get citation
Faubert, J. & Herbert, A. M. (1999). The Peripheral Drift Illusion: A Motion Illusion in the Visual Periphery. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1068/p2825

See more details
More for · 4
2007
Examines a variant of the anomalous motion illusion in static patterns and finds luminance contrast to be a critical factor.
Get citation
Kitaoka, A. & Ashida, H. (2007). A Variant of the Anomalous Motion Illusion Based upon Contrast and Visual Latency. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5362

2025
Shows that static illusion patterns with asymmetrical luminance gradients evoke motion illusions tied to reflexive changes in pupil diameter.
Get citation
G, M. & P, C. (2025). Pupil dilation underlies the peripheral drift illusion.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.2.13

2024
Examines both dynamic and static 2D patterns that evoke distinctive perceptions of motion or optic flow.
Get citation
B, L., S, N., & A, K. (2024). Tunnel motion: Pupil dilations to optic flow within illusory dark holes.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066241270493

2024
Investigates the Rotating Snakes illusion, confirming that stationary images elicit a compelling sense of anomalous motion.
Get citation
M, U., A, B., H, A., & G, M. (2024). Blue-yellow combination enhances perceived motion in Rotating Snakes illusion.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695241242346

What does the evidence say?

The claim is a specific, empirically testable scientific proposition about visual perception. The provided literature includes foundational and recent studies (such as Kitaoka's peripheral drift illusion work, investigations into contrast-based visual latency, and research on static illusory expanding holes and the Rotating Snakes illusion) that consistently support the fact that static images can induce motion illusions via peripheral drift and related luminance mechanisms. There are no refuting papers.

Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8604 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work