trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Stan Taylor discovered human footprints dated from the period of dinosaurs

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 3 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that Stan Taylor discovered human footprints dated from the period of dinosaurs?

No. Scientific investigations of the Paluxy River site associated with Stan Taylor have conclusively demonstrated that the purported human footprints are actually dinosaur tracks or altered features, refuting the claim that human prints coexist with dinosaur fossils.

Verdict: REFUTED · 0 sources for, 3 against · Last checked

The analysis

The retrieved scientific literature consistently debunks the claim that Stan Taylor or anyone else discovered human footprints alongside dinosaur fossils in the Paluxy River bed. Papers [1] and [2] directly examine the Taylor site and document that the tracks are dinosaurian (tridactyl) in origin or altered, while paper [0] provides the broader geological and ichnological explanation for why elongate dinosaur tracks can superficially resemble human prints. There are no supporting papers in the retrieved set.

Evidence against · 3
A new solution to an old riddle: elongate dinosaur tracks explained as deep penetration of the foot, not plantigrade locomotion
2021
Explains elongate dinosaur tracks, including those historically misidentified as human prints by creationists in the Paluxy River bed, as deep foot penetrations in soft sediment.
Get citation
Lallensack, J. N., Farlow, J., & Falkingham, P. (2021). A new solution to an old riddle: elongate dinosaur tracks explained as deep penetration of the foot, not plantigrade locomotion. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1111/pala.12584

See more details
More against · 2
Dinosaur Tracks, Erosion Marks and Midnight Chisel Work (But No Human Footprints) In the Cretaceous Limestone of the Paluxy River Bed, Texas
1983
Demonstrates that the Paluxy River tracks associated with Stan Taylor are not human footprints, but rather large, poorly defined dinosaur tracks and carved artifacts.
Get citation
Milne, D. & Schafersman, S. (1983). Dinosaur Tracks, Erosion Marks and Midnight Chisel Work (But No Human Footprints) In the Cretaceous Limestone of the Paluxy River Bed, Texas. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.5408/0022-1368-31.2.111

New Observations on Paluxy Tracks Confirm Their Dinosaurian Origin
1987
Confirms through detailed measurements and color distinctions at the Taylor site that the alleged human tracks are actually tridactyl dinosaur footprints.
Get citation
Hastings, R. J. (1987). New Observations on Paluxy Tracks Confirm Their Dinosaurian Origin. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.5408/0022-1368-35.1.4

Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → REFUTED · 1004 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work