trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Spain holds sovereignty over Ceuta and Melilla
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
3 sources for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Reference works and official records uniformly state that Ceuta and Melilla are Spanish territories, confirming that Spain holds sovereignty over them despite Moroccan territorial claims.

Evidence for · 3
Wikipedia: Ceuta
cited by 0
Reference article covering this claim directly
See more details
How claims like this are judged

Judged against reference works: claims of this kind are settled by the historical reference record, not journal abstracts.

More for · 2
Book: International Development Law
2019 · cited by 0
Lists Ceuta and Melilla as Spanish plazas de soberanía.
Wikisource: The World Factbook (1982)/Morocco
cited by 0
Refers to Spanish-controlled Ceuta and Melilla.
Everything we examined (14) — 7 independent sources
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Wikipedia: Ceutareferencesupports
  2. Book: European Border Regions in Comparisonreferencesame source L2no side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  3. Book: International Development Lawreferencesupports
  4. Book: Migration, Inclusiveness and Sustainabilityreferencesupportsnot shown: a book whose author and subject did not establish authority here
  5. Book: The Europa World Year Book 2004referencesame source L2supportsnot shown: a book whose author and subject did not establish authority here
  6. Book: Europereferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  7. Wikisource: The World Factbook (1982)/Moroccoreferencesame source L6supports
  8. Wikisource: NIS 9, Spain, Armed Forcesreferencesame source L6no side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  9. Wikisource: Constitutive Law of the Cortesreferencesame source L6no side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  10. the madison daily leader (madison, s.d.) 1890-current: the madison daily leader (madison, s.d.) 1890-currentreferencesame source L7no side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  11. new ulm review (new ulm, brown county, minn.) 1892-1961: new ulm review (new ulm, brown county, minn.) 1892-1961referencesame source L7no side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  12. the daily gazette-times (corvallis, benton county, or.) 1909-1921: the daily gazette-times (corvallis, benton county, or.) 1909-1921referencesame source L7no side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  13. the pascoag herald (pascoag, r.i.) 1900-1918: the pascoag herald (pascoag, r.i.) 1900-1918referencesame source L7no side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  14. the daily missoulian (missoula, mont.) 1904-1961: the daily missoulian (missoula, mont.) 1904-1961referencesame source L7no side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked06 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7506 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt