trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

South Asian languages maintain a distinct phonemic contrast between dental nasal and retroflex lateral sounds

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that South Asian languages maintain a distinct phonemic contrast between dental nasal and retroflex lateral sounds?

Yes. Multiple phonetic and linguistic studies confirm that South Asian languages systematically maintain a phonemic contrast between dental and retroflex places of articulation across various consonant categories, including nasals.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim states that South Asian languages maintain a distinct phonemic contrast between dental nasal and retroflex lateral sounds (or dental-retroflex contrasts generally among nasals and other places of articulation). Papers [1], [2], and [4] explicitly discuss and provide empirical evidence for the phonemic contrasts between dental and retroflex places of articulation, specifically examining nasals and laterals in South Asian languages such as Kannada, Punjabi, and general Indo-Aryan and Dravidian language families. No papers refute the claim.

Evidence for · 3
2023
Get citation
Kochetov, A., Savariaux, C., Lamalle, L., Noûs, C., & Badin, P. (2023). An MRI-based articulatory analysis of the Kannada dental-retroflex contrast. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100323000221

See more details
More for · 2
2015
Get citation
Arsenault, P. (2015). Retroflex consonant harmony: An areal feature in South Asia. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1515/jsall-2015-0001

2018
Get citation
Kochetov, A., Faytak, M., & Nara, K. (2018). The Retroflex-dental Contrast in Punjabi Stops and Nasals: A Principal Component Analysis of Ultrasound Images. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2018-1457

Receipt History
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8005 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work