trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Shooting someone in the forehead from point blank range can fail to kill him

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that shooting someone in the forehead from point blank range can fail to kill him?

Yes. Clinical literature confirms that individuals can survive gunshot wounds to the head due to factors such as low bullet velocity, trajectory bypassing critical midline structures, and prompt surgical intervention.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim states that shooting someone in the forehead from point blank range can fail to kill them. This is an empirical statement about survival after close-range cranial trauma. Multiple medical papers detail cases where patients survived penetrating head injuries or gunshot wounds to the head, often depending on trajectory and velocity. Therefore, the evidence supports the claim.

Evidence for · 3
"Time is brain" the Gifford factor - or: Why do some civilian gunshot wounds to the head do unexpectedly well? A case series with outcomes analysis and a management guide.
2012
Demonstrates that patients with civilian gunshot wounds to the head can survive and achieve good outcomes after emergent neurosurgical intervention.
Get citation
DJ, L., FC, L., JJ, S., A, T., & EM, K. (2012). "Time is brain" the Gifford factor - or: Why do some civilian gunshot wounds to the head do unexpectedly well? A case series with outcomes analysis and a management guide.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.100187

See more details
More for · 2
Penetrating Orbitocranial Injuries in the Republic of Korea.
2023
Notes that patients with penetrating head injuries who do not experience major vessel injury or midline involvement can survive without fatal consequences.
Get citation
JW, H., JJ, L., E, L., & MH, L. (2023). Penetrating Orbitocranial Injuries in the Republic of Korea.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.13004/kjnt.2023.19.e37

Country-Made Firearm (Desi-Katta)-Related Cranial Injuries: An Institutional Experience.
2022
Documents that low-muzzle velocity head injuries frequently result in nonfatal outcomes even with surgical intervention.
Get citation
D, M., RS, D., RK, M., D, S., R, S., S, K., D, G., S, V., PK, S., D, A., M, S., PS, C., & SS, K. (2022). Country-Made Firearm (Desi-Katta)-Related Cranial Injuries: An Institutional Experience.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.4103/0028-3886.359174

What does the evidence say?

The claim states that shooting someone in the forehead from point blank range can fail to kill them. This is an empirical statement about survival after close-range cranial trauma. Multiple medical papers detail cases where patients survived penetrating head injuries or gunshot wounds to the head, often depending on trajectory and velocity. Therefore, the evidence supports the claim.

Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8404 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work