trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Scared Straight programs reduce criminal activity in participants

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 3 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that Scared Straight programs reduce criminal activity in participants?

No. Contrary to the claim, rigorous systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials have consistently shown that Scared Straight programs do not reduce criminal activity and actually increase the likelihood of future offending.

Verdict: REFUTED · 0 sources for, 3 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim asserts that Scared Straight programs reduce criminal activity. Multiple high-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (e.g., Petrosino et al., 2002; Petrosino et al., 2013) directly examine this claim and find the exact opposite: participation in Scared Straight programs significantly increases subsequent delinquency and criminal behavior compared to control groups. No retrieved papers support the claim, leading to a REFUTED verdict.

Evidence against · 3
"Scared Straight" and other juvenile awareness programs for preventing juvenile delinquency.
2002
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials demonstrates that Scared Straight programs are ineffective and actually increase subsequent delinquency relative to doing nothing.
Get citation
Petrosino, A. & Turpin-Petrosino, C. (2002). "Scared Straight" and other juvenile awareness programs for preventing juvenile delinquency.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd002796

See more details
More against · 2
Well-Meaning Programs Can Have Harmful Effects! Lessons from Experiments of Programs Such as Scared Straight
2000
Discusses results from systematic evaluations of prison visitation programs, showing that well-meaning initiatives like Scared Straight can have harmful, criminogenic effects.
Get citation
Petrosino, A., Turpin-Petrosino, C., & Finckenauer, J. O. (2000). Well-Meaning Programs Can Have Harmful Effects! Lessons from Experiments of Programs Such as Scared Straight. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128700046003006

'Scared Straight' and other juvenile awareness programs for preventing juvenile delinquency.
2013
An updated systematic review confirms that Scared Straight programs increase delinquency rather than reduce it, meaning they cannot be recommended as crime prevention strategies.
Get citation
A, P., C, T., ME, H., & JG, L. (2013). 'Scared Straight' and other juvenile awareness programs for preventing juvenile delinquency.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd002796.pub2

What does the evidence say?

The claim asserts that Scared Straight programs reduce criminal activity. Multiple high-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (e.g., Petrosino et al., 2002; Petrosino et al., 2013) directly examine this claim and find the exact opposite: participation in Scared Straight programs significantly increases subsequent delinquency and criminal behavior compared to control groups. No retrieved papers support the claim, leading to a REFUTED verdict.

Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → REFUTED · 1404 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work