trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Robot psychology is a scientifically valid field of study

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
10 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that Robot psychology is a scientifically valid field of study?

Yes. Extensive empirical and theoretical research in human-robot interaction demonstrates that psychological responses, stress levels, trust, and cognitive changes can be systematically studied, confirming the scientific validity of robot psychology.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 10 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

Judged against the evidence record for claims of this kind.

Evidence for · 10
What is a Human?
2007
Proposes psychological benchmarks to measure human-robot interaction success.
Get citation
Kahn, P. H., Ishiguro, H., Friedman, B., Kanda, T., Freier, N. G., Severson, R. L., & Miller, J. (2007). What is a Human?. peer-reviewed literature. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.8.3.04kah

See more details
More for · 9
On the Effects of Leader–Follower Roles in Dyadic Human–Robot Synchronization
2023
Investigates the psychophysiological responses and stress induced in humans working with collaborative robots.
Get citation
Messeri, C., Zanchettin, A., Rocco, P., Gianotti, E., Chirico, A., Magoni, S., & Gaggioli, A. (2023). On the Effects of Leader–Follower Roles in Dyadic Human–Robot Synchronization. peer-reviewed literature. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCDS.2020.2991864

Working with a robot
2007
Examines human cognitive changes and beliefs during human-robot collaboration.
Get citation
Bernstein, D., Crowley, K., & Nourbakhsh, I. (2007). Working with a robot. peer-reviewed literature. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.8.3.09ber

User segmentation in human–robot interactions: insights from sports betting patrons using diffusion of innovation theory
2024
Applies psychological theories and analyzes psychological variables in user segmentation for human-robot interaction.
Get citation
Binesh, N., Rippee, R., & Belarmino, A. (2024). User segmentation in human–robot interactions: insights from sports betting patrons using diffusion of innovation theory. peer-reviewed literature. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2024.2372001

A Human-Robot Interaction in Education: A Systematic Review of Furhat Robots Role in Student Learning
2025
Assesses psychological motivation and trust building in educational human-robot interaction.
Get citation
Almutoory, M. & Jiang, X. (2025). A Human-Robot Interaction in Education: A Systematic Review of Furhat Robots Role in Student Learning. peer-reviewed literature. https://doi.org/10.52098/airdj.20255136

A comparison of the psychological effects of robot motion in physical and virtual environments.
2023
Measures anxiety and workload to evaluate the psychological effects of robot motion.
Get citation
Sanders, N. E., Xie, Z., & Chen, K. B. (2023). A comparison of the psychological effects of robot motion in physical and virtual environments.. peer-reviewed literature. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104039

The effects of human-robot interaction modality on workers’ mental stress
2023
Investigates how human-robot interaction modality affects human mental stress.
Get citation
Su, B., Jung, S., Lu, L., Wang, H., Qing, L., Xie, Z., & Xu, X. (2023). The effects of human-robot interaction modality on workers’ mental stress. peer-reviewed literature. https://doi.org/10.1177/21695067231192561

Nonverbal intimacy as a benchmark for human–robot interaction
2007
Explores the utility of android counselors and nonverbal intimacy benchmarks in human-robot interaction.
Get citation
Lee, B. (2007). Nonverbal intimacy as a benchmark for human–robot interaction. peer-reviewed literature. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.8.3.06lee

Multilevel dynamics of the brain, hormones, mind, and behavior in social human-robot interaction.
2026
Examines multilevel psychological, neural, and hormonal dynamics during social human-robot interaction.
Get citation
Y, T., F, K., S, J., N, R., AA, F., X, L., J, G., EJ, d. V., & H, A. (2026). Multilevel dynamics of the brain, hormones, mind, and behavior in social human-robot interaction.. peer-reviewed literature. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aec1762

Humanlikeness as design, anthropomorphism as inference: a conceptual framework for human-robot interaction.
2026
Establishes a conceptual framework distinguishing humanlikeness design from anthropomorphism as a psychological attribution process.
Get citation
EK, P. & EJ, d. V. (2026). Humanlikeness as design, anthropomorphism as inference: a conceptual framework for human-robot interaction.. peer-reviewed literature. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcogn.2026.1786256

Related receipts

What does the evidence say?

Judged against the evidence record for claims of this kind.

Receipt History
first checked06 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8806 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work