trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

RNA polymerase predictably fails to transcribe repetitive sequences accurately

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
6 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that RNA polymerase predictably fails to transcribe repetitive sequences accurately?

Yes. Multiple studies demonstrate that RNA polymerases predictably undergo transcriptional slippage or inaccurate synthesis when encountering repetitive sequences and homopolymeric stretches.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 6 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The retrieved papers consistently report that RNA polymerases across various organisms and viruses predictably experience transcriptional slippage (indels) when transcribing repetitive sequences and homopolymeric runs. No papers refute this phenomenon; instead, they detail its mechanisms, predictability, and biological consequences. Therefore, the verdict is SUPPORTED.

Evidence for · 6
2015
Demonstrates that viral RNA polymerases predictably undergo transcriptional slippage when encountering conserved repetitive sequences like GAAAAAA.
Get citation
Olspert, A., Chung, B., Atkins, J. F., Carr, J., & Firth, A. (2015). Transcriptional slippage in the positive-sense RNA virus family Potyviridae. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201540509

See more details
More for · 5
2015
Shows via high-throughput sequencing that reiterative initiation and transcriptional slippage occur predictably from the majority of transcription start site region sequences.
Get citation
Vvedenskaya, I., Zhang, Y., Goldman, S. R., Valenti, A., Visone, V., Taylor, D. M., Ebright, R., & Nickels, B. E. (2015). Massively Systematic Transcript End Readout (MASTER): Transcription Start Site Selection, Transcriptional Slippage, and Transcript Yields. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.029

2016
Indicates that viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerases predictably slip at conserved homopolymeric motifs to produce alternative reading frame proteins.
Get citation
Hagiwara-Komoda, Y., Choi, S., Sato, M., Atsumi, G., Abe, J., Fukuda, J., Honjo, M., Nagano, A., Komoda, K., Nakahara, K., Uyeda, I., & Naito, S. (2016). Truncated yet functional viral protein produced via RNA polymerase slippage implies underestimated coding capacity of RNA viruses. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21411

2018
Compares RNA polymerases and confirms that they predictably exhibit propensity for non-programmed transcriptional slippage at homopolymeric sequences in a sequence-dependent manner.
Get citation
Koscielniak, D., Wons, E., Wilkowska, K., & Sektas, M. (2018). Non-programmed transcriptional frameshifting is common and highly RNA polymerase type-dependent. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-018-1034-4

2018
Finds that viral polymerases predictably slip at specific homopolymeric nucleotide runs during RNA synthesis.
Get citation
Stewart, H., Olspert, A., Butt, B. G., & Firth, A. (2018). Propensity of a picornavirus polymerase to slip on potyvirus-derived transcriptional slippage sites. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1099/jgv.0.001189

2024
Highlights that transcriptional slippage by viral replicases consistently occurs when transcribing specific repetitive motifs such as An stretches.
Get citation
Valli, A. A., Domingo-Calap, M. L., Prádena, A. G. d., García, J. A., Cui, H., Desbiez, C., & López-Moya, J. (2024). Reconceptualizing transcriptional slippage in plant RNA viruses. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.02120-24

What does the evidence say?

The retrieved papers consistently report that RNA polymerases across various organisms and viruses predictably experience transcriptional slippage (indels) when transcribing repetitive sequences and homopolymeric runs. No papers refute this phenomenon; instead, they detail its mechanisms, predictability, and biological consequences. Therefore, the verdict is SUPPORTED.

Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8904 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work