trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Right node raising is a valid syntactic coordination phenomenon

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that right node raising is a valid syntactic coordination phenomenon?

Yes. Linguistic literature widely recognizes Right Node Raising as a valid coordination phenomenon, examining its properties through various syntactic and prosodic models.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim states that Right node raising is a valid syntactic coordination phenomenon. Papers [2], [3], and [6] directly discuss Right Node Raising (RNR) as a recognized syntactic and coordination phenomenon, debating its underlying mechanisms (such as ellipsis, movement, or multiple dominance) rather than questioning its existence. The remaining papers are off-topic (dealing with Drosophila connectomes, speech motor coordination, syntax metrics in NLP, neuroimaging, etc.). Therefore, the evidence clearly supports the claim.

Evidence for · 3
2001
Investigates Right Node Raising as a coordinate structure phenomenon driven by prosodic and focus constraints.
Get citation
Hartmann, K. (2001). Right Node Raising and Gapping. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.106

See more details
More for · 2
2015
Analyzes Right-Node-Raising constructions as valid coordinate structures involving shared elements across conjuncts.
Get citation
Grosz, P. G. (2015). Movement and Agreement in Right‐Node‐Raising Constructions. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12024

2018
Reviews Right-Node Raising as backward conjunction reduction and discusses theoretical frameworks for explaining the phenomenon.
Get citation
Wilder, C. (2018). Conjunction Reduction and Right-Node Raising. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780198712398.013.29

Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8404 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work