Right node raising is a valid syntactic coordination phenomenon
Is it true that right node raising is a valid syntactic coordination phenomenon?
Yes. Linguistic literature widely recognizes Right Node Raising as a valid coordination phenomenon, examining its properties through various syntactic and prosodic models.
Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked
The claim states that Right node raising is a valid syntactic coordination phenomenon. Papers [2], [3], and [6] directly discuss Right Node Raising (RNR) as a recognized syntactic and coordination phenomenon, debating its underlying mechanisms (such as ellipsis, movement, or multiple dominance) rather than questioning its existence. The remaining papers are off-topic (dealing with Drosophila connectomes, speech motor coordination, syntax metrics in NLP, neuroimaging, etc.). Therefore, the evidence clearly supports the claim.
Get citation
Hartmann, K. (2001). Right Node Raising and Gapping. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.106
See more details
Get citation
Grosz, P. G. (2015). Movement and Agreement in Right‐Node‐Raising Constructions. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12024
Get citation
Wilder, C. (2018). Conjunction Reduction and Right-Node Raising. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780198712398.013.29
Receipt History
Challenge the receipt
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work