trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Restaurants in China commonly use recycled gutter oil.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that Restaurants in China commonly use recycled gutter oil?

Yes. Evidence and academic literature document that the illegal production and use of gutter oil has been a documented food safety concern and form of food fraud in China.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The retrieved literature (especially paper [7] and references to food fraud in [1] and [6]) directly supports the claim that gutter oil has been a notable food safety issue in China. There are no papers refuting the premise that restaurants or illicit actors have engaged in this practice.

Evidence for · 3
2017
This commentary explicitly identifies gutter oil (swill-cooked oil) as one of the top concerns in Chinese food safety and summarizes key incidents and policies surrounding it.
Get citation
J, L., N, C., & J, L. (2017). Gutter oil: an overview of Chinese food safety issues and policies.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757975915623733

See more details
More for · 2
2019
This study notes that China's food safety governance system faces ongoing challenges, including the use of substandard materials and adulterated products.
Get citation
Z, L., AN, M., & H, C. (2019). Food safety governance in China: From supervision to coregulation.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1281

2018
This paper highlights that persistent incidents of food fraud in China have led to low levels of consumer trust in the safety of domestically produced food.
Get citation
H, K., P, N., S, K., M, R., M, D., B, C., H, S., R, H., MY, C., Q, Z., P, B., & LJ, F. (2018). Food fraud and the perceived integrity of European food imports into China.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195817

Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8504 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work