trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Rainbows are observed at specific angles relative to the observer in the sky

the verdict
COMMON KNOWLEDGE
Legacy classification; evidence review pending
Recorded sources
no sources on either side

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that rainbows are observed at specific angles relative to the observer in the sky?

Rainbows are an optical phenomenon formed by the refraction, internal reflection, and dispersion of light in water droplets, which consistently emerge at a characteristic angle of approximately 42 degrees relative to the anti-solar point for the primary bow. This is a matter of basic physical optics and everyday observation requiring no formal citation.

Verdict: COMMON KNOWLEDGE · 0 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim states a fundamental, well-understood law of geometrical optics regarding atmospheric rainbows (the primary rainbow's ~42-degree angle). By the instructions, statements that are trivially true by definition or direct everyday observation are categorized as COMMON_KNOWLEDGE, with no citations or paper indices attached.

What does the evidence say?

The claim states a fundamental, well-understood law of geometrical optics regarding atmospheric rainbows (the primary rainbow's ~42-degree angle). By the instructions, statements that are trivially true by definition or direct everyday observation are categorized as COMMON_KNOWLEDGE, with no citations or paper indices attached.

Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → COMMON KNOWLEDGE · 9504 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work