trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Radon exposure at reference levels of 100Bq/m3 and 300Bq/m3 poses significant health risks
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
5 sources for · 0 against

Multiple studies demonstrate that residential and occupational radon exposure at reference levels of 100 Bq/m3 and 300 Bq/m3 poses significant health risks, primarily by increasing the incidence of and mortality from lung cancer.

Evidence for · 5
2021 · cited by 33
Paper [0] notes that residential radon levels over 100 Bq/m3 account for significant lung cancer mortality fractions.
See more details
The analysis

The retrieved papers consistently establish that residential and occupational radon concentrations at or above the 100 Bq/m3 and 300 Bq/m3 thresholds are major risk factors for lung cancer. Studies such as [0], [3], [6], [7], and [8] explicitly evaluate radon exposure around these reference levels and quantify the attributable health burdens. None of the provided papers refute the claim.

More for · 4
2022 · cited by 18
Paper [3] evaluates the impact of reducing radon exposure from action levels of 100 and 300 Bq/m3, highlighting substantial attributable risk.
2025 · cited by 9
Paper [6] demonstrates that living in dwellings with radon concentrations above 300 Bq/m3 substantially and steadily increases lung cancer risk with duration.
2025 · cited by 8
Paper [7] shows that indoor radon concentrations exceeding reference levels like 100 Bq/m3 correspond to high annual effective doses and excess lifetime cancer risks.
2022 · cited by 8
Paper [8] characterizes occupational exposure at levels starting above 100 Bq/m3, highlighting the need for prevention programs against lung cancer.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8404 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt