trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Quantum entanglement disproves the principle of locality

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that quantum entanglement disproves the principle of locality?

Yes. Quantum entanglement leads to the violation of Bell's inequalities, confirming that physical theories cannot simultaneously satisfy both quantum mechanics and local realism.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 2 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The retrieved literature consistently supports the standard quantum mechanical consensus that entanglement violates Bell inequalities, thereby ruling out local hidden variable theories (local realism). While some theoretical papers (e.g., [4]) debate the metaphysical interpretations of 'nonlocality' or attempt contextual reformulations, the core empirical fact remains that local realism is disproven by the violation of Bell inequalities. Papers [9] and [11] explicitly demonstrate these violations and the failure of local realism.

Evidence for · 2
2024
The paper demonstrates a loophole-free test of local realism via Hardy's violation, providing strong empirical evidence against local realistic theories.
Get citation
SR, Z., S, Z., HH, D., WZ, L., JL, C., K, C., Q, Z., & JW, P. (2024). Loophole-Free Test of Local Realism via Hardy's Violation.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.133.060201

See more details
More for · 1
2026
The paper observes Bell correlations in momentum-entangled atoms, reinforcing the non-local nature of quantum entanglement.
Get citation
YS, A., S, K., XT, Y., RJ, L., KV, K., AG, T., & SS, H. (2026). Bell correlations between momentum-entangled pairs of <sup>4</sup>He<sup>*</sup> atoms.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69070-3

Related receipts
Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7704 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work