trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Psychological factors systematically bias quality assessments

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that psychological factors systematically bias quality assessments?

Yes. Evidence from multiple studies confirms that psychological factors and cognitive biases systematically influence and skew human quality assessments across various domains.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 2 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The retrieved papers include studies directly examining how cognitive biases, human limitations, and psychological factors affect quality assessments (such as medical imaging evaluation and crowdsourced multi-criteria assessments). Papers [9] and [11] provide explicit empirical support for the claim that psychological factors and biases systematically skew quality evaluations. The remaining papers discuss psychological factors in different contexts (like student stress, decision-making in sports, or quality of life) but do not contradict the claim. Thus, the evidence strongly supports the claim.

Evidence for · 2
2024
Get citation
Su, J., Li, M., Lin, Y., Xiong, L., Yuan, C., Zhou, Z., & Yan, K. (2024). A deep learning-based automatic image quality assessment method for respiratory phase on computed tomography chest images. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-23-1273

See more details
More for · 1
2024
Get citation
Ito, S. & Kashima, H. (2024). Mitigating Cognitive Biases in Multi-Criteria Crowd Assessment. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.18938

Related receipts
Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7804 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work