trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Plural and singular first person forms of go are suppletive in Romance languages

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that plural and singular first person forms of go are suppletive in Romance languages?

Yes. Multiple morphological and historical linguistics studies support the presence of suppletive stem forms in the paradigm of the verb 'go' across Romance languages.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The retrieved papers consistently confirm that verbal paradigms for the verb 'go' in Romance languages exhibit suppletion, drawing on both synchronic morphological frameworks (such as Distributed Morphology) and diachronic analyses of Latin and Romance dialects. None of the provided papers refute the claim.

Evidence for · 3
Romance Root Suppletion and Cumulative Exponence: Fusion, Pruning, Spanning
2022
The paper provides an analysis of stem suppletion within Romance verbs, specifically focusing on the verb 'go'.
Get citation
Pomino, N. & Remberger, E. (2022). Romance Root Suppletion and Cumulative Exponence: Fusion, Pruning, Spanning. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7030161

See more details
More for · 2
Preclassical and Classical Latin precursors of Romance verb-stem suppletion
2000
The paper discusses historical Romance verb-stem suppletion relating to the verb of going, echoing classic observations about forms like those in the Peregrinatio Aetheriae.
Get citation
Rosen, H. (2000). Preclassical and Classical Latin precursors of Romance verb-stem suppletion. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110243468.270

Layering and divergence in Romance periphrases
2022
The paper examines patterns of suppletion with GO verbs across Romance varieties such as Catalan.
Get citation
Vincent, N. & Wheeler, M. (2022). Layering and divergence in Romance periphrases. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198870807.003.0004

What does the evidence say?

The retrieved papers consistently confirm that verbal paradigms for the verb 'go' in Romance languages exhibit suppletion, drawing on both synchronic morphological frameworks (such as Distributed Morphology) and diachronic analyses of Latin and Romance dialects. None of the provided papers refute the claim.

Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8104 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work