trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Philosophical frameworks exist that posit entities beyond mind and matter

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
6 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that philosophical frameworks exist that posit entities beyond mind and matter?

Yes. Philosophical frameworks such as dualism, idealism, neutral monism, and dual-aspect theories explicitly posit entities or foundational domains beyond simple mind and matter.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 6 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The retrieved literature extensively discusses philosophical traditions, historical frameworks, and contemporary theories (such as dualism, idealist frameworks, dual-aspect monism, and psychophysically neutral domains) that explicitly go beyond traditional materialist or strictly physicalist ontologies. Multiple papers validate or explore these non-reductionist and expanded metaphysical positions.

Evidence for · 6
Inner Experience – Direct Access to Reality: A Complementarist Ontology and Dual Aspect Monism Support a Broader Epistemology
2020
Proposes a complementarist dual-aspect model where consciousness is coprimary with matter.
Get citation
Walach, H. (2020). Inner Experience – Direct Access to Reality: A Complementarist Ontology and Dual Aspect Monism Support a Broader Epistemology. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00640

See more details
More for · 5
Psychophysical neutrality and its descendants: a brief primer for dual-aspect monism
2024
Discusses historical and contemporary accounts of psychophysically neutral domains beyond simple mind-matter dichotomies.
Get citation
Atmanspacher, H. (2024). Psychophysical neutrality and its descendants: a brief primer for dual-aspect monism. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04449-z

The extended dual-aspect monism framework: an attempt to solve the hard problem
2018
Advances an extended dual-aspect monism framework incorporating primary irreducible subjective experiences alongside physical aspects.
Get citation
Vimal, R. (2018). The extended dual-aspect monism framework: an attempt to solve the hard problem. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2018.V41ESP.09.P153

The nature of mind scale (NOMS): Validation of an eight-dimensional scale assessing beliefs about the relationship between mind and matter.
2025
Validates a scale assessing diverse philosophical positions on mind and matter, including substance dualism, panpsychism, idealism, and neutral monism.
Get citation
Forstmann, M. & Burgmer, P. (2025). The nature of mind scale (NOMS): Validation of an eight-dimensional scale assessing beliefs about the relationship between mind and matter.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2025.103961

Mind, Matter, and Liberation in Sankhya: An Analytical Study
2024
Examines Sāṅkhya philosophy as a distinct dualistic paradigm separating pure awareness from material nature.
Get citation
Garai, P. (2024). Mind, Matter, and Liberation in Sankhya: An Analytical Study. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.31305/rrjiks.2024.v1.n2.015

A Philosophical Reassessment of Consciousness-Matter Relations
2026
Analyzes frameworks such as ether-mind dualistic ontology that posit entities beyond standard materialist models.
Get citation
Cui, W. (2026). A Philosophical Reassessment of Consciousness-Matter Relations. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5313/2026.02.005

What does the evidence say?

The retrieved literature extensively discusses philosophical traditions, historical frameworks, and contemporary theories (such as dualism, idealist frameworks, dual-aspect monism, and psychophysically neutral domains) that explicitly go beyond traditional materialist or strictly physicalist ontologies. Multiple papers validate or explore these non-reductionist and expanded metaphysical positions.

Receipt History
first checked31 Jul 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8331 Jul 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work