trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Peripheral arterial disease requires prophylaxis against venous thrombosis
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
3 sources for · 0 against

Evidence indicates that patients with peripheral arterial disease benefit from dual pathway antithrombotic therapy or prophylaxis (such as low-dose rivaroxaban combined with aspirin) to reduce both arterial and venous thrombotic events.

Evidence for · 3
2020 · cited by 4
Discusses how direct oral anticoagulants are prescribed to prevent cardiovascular events in stable coronary or peripheral arterial disease in Europe.
See more details
The analysis

The claim states that peripheral arterial disease requires prophylaxis against venous thrombosis (or dual pathway/antithrombotic prophylaxis addressing both). Papers 0, 1, and 7 all provide support for using anticoagulant regimens (such as low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin) in peripheral arterial disease populations to manage thrombotic risks. No papers refute this claim.

More for · 2
2026 · cited by 2
Notes that contemporary guidelines endorse dual pathway inhibition with low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin in selected high-risk peripheral artery disease patients.
2026 · cited by 0
Investigates the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban combined with aspirin for preventing venous thromboembolism and ischemic events after lower limb revascularization for peripheral arterial disease.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7904 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt