trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

PBE and LDA density functional approximations can sometimes outperform more expensive methods.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that PBE and LDA density functional approximations can sometimes outperform more expensive methods?

Yes. PBE and LDA density functional approximations can sometimes outperform or match more expensive methods while requiring significantly less computational effort.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 2 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The retrieved papers include studies showing that lower-cost density functional approximations (like LDA variants and PBE-based schemes) can achieve high accuracy compared to expensive methods such as GW or hybrid functionals, particularly when appropriate corrections or specific properties are evaluated.

Evidence for · 2
2015
Get citation
Ribeiro, M. (2015). <i>Ab initio</i> quasi-particle approximation bandgaps of silicon nanowires calculated at density functional theory/local density approximation computational effort. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4922337

See more details
More for · 1
2026
Get citation
A, A., R, L., A, J., G, H., N, R., L, M., A, H., & S, d. G. (2026). An Accurate Alternative to Hybrid Functionals for Germanium: DFT+α.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5c05816

Related receipts

What does the evidence say?

The retrieved papers include studies showing that lower-cost density functional approximations (like LDA variants and PBE-based schemes) can achieve high accuracy compared to expensive methods such as GW or hybrid functionals, particularly when appropriate corrections or specific properties are evaluated.

Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8104 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work