trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Non-physicalist and non-materialist models of human cognition exist in philosophy of mind

the verdict
COMMON KNOWLEDGE
Legacy classification; evidence review pending
Recorded sources
no sources on either side

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that Non-physicalist and non-materialist models of human cognition exist in philosophy of mind?

The existence of non-physicalist and non-materialist models of human cognition in the philosophy of mind is a matter of common knowledge and standard philosophical categorization, requiring no empirical citation.

Verdict: COMMON KNOWLEDGE · 0 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim asserts that non-physicalist and non-materialist models of human cognition exist within philosophy of mind. This is a matter of standard academic definition and historical taxonomy (e.g., dualism, idealism, mental monism, and various non-reductionist frameworks are foundational subjects in philosophy of mind). Under STEP 0, claims that are trivially true by definition or standard disciplinary taxonomy are classified as COMMON_KNOWLEDGE, meaning no citation is needed and no evidence weighing is required.

What does the evidence say?

The claim asserts that non-physicalist and non-materialist models of human cognition exist within philosophy of mind. This is a matter of standard academic definition and historical taxonomy (e.g., dualism, idealism, mental monism, and various non-reductionist frameworks are foundational subjects in philosophy of mind). Under STEP 0, claims that are trivially true by definition or standard disciplinary taxonomy are classified as COMMON_KNOWLEDGE, meaning no citation is needed and no evidence weighing is required.

Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → COMMON KNOWLEDGE · 9504 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work