Non-philosophy in the works of François Laruelle refers to the radical suspension of philosophical sufficiency.
Is it true that Non-philosophy in the works of François Laruelle refers to the radical suspension of philosophical sufficiency?
Yes. Scholarship on François Laruelle consistently demonstrates that non-philosophy functions as a radical suspension of philosophy's traditional claims to self-sufficiency and conceptual totalization.
Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked
The retrieved literature (Papers 1, 4, and 5) directly discusses François Laruelle's non-philosophy as a challenge to philosophical self-sufficiency, conceptual totalization, and the hierarchical domination of the Real by philosophical thought. The papers support the claim by analyzing how non-philosophy suspends these foundational philosophical pretensions in favor of a radical immanence and a democratic, non-reductive approach. There are no papers contradicting the claim.
Get citation
Maoilearca, J. Ó. (2017). Laruelle, Immanence, and Performance: What Does Non-Philosophy Do?. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.21476/pp.2017.33143
See more details
Get citation
Culture, I. J. f. P. G. a. & Isaak, O. P. (2021). An Algorithmic Socialism in Defense of the Lived Without Life: A Political Proposal through Capitalism’s Holocaust of Animals by Katerina Kolozova. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.51151/identities.v18i1-2.484
Get citation
Strelchuk, A. (2023). Immanence as Resistance. (Non-)philosophical dialog between Gilles Deleuze and François Laruelle. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.62988/2949-5202-2023-1-1-197-226
Receipt History
Challenge the receipt
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work