trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Negative affect toward subject matter impairs cognitive processing and learning efficiency

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
4 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that negative affect toward subject matter impairs cognitive processing and learning efficiency?

Yes. Evidence across multiple psychological and neurophysiological studies indicates that negative affect and emotional valence impair cognitive processing efficiency by imposing extraneous cognitive load and diverting neural resources away from primary tasks.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 4 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The retrieved papers consistently demonstrate that negative affect, emotional valence, or stress negatively impact cognitive load and efficiency by diverting attentional resources and increasing extraneous load. Papers [0], [1], [8], and [10] provide direct empirical support for this relationship using behavioral, neurophysiological, and self-report measures. None of the papers refute the claim.

Evidence for · 4
2024
Get citation
Balconi, M. & Rovelli, K. (2024). Does emotional valence affect cognitive performance and neurophysiological response during decision making? A preliminary study. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2024.1408526

See more details
More for · 3
2024
Get citation
Cai, M., Rebolledo-Méndez, G., Arevalo, G., Tang, S. S., Abdullah, Y. A., & Epp, C. D. (2024). Toward Supporting Adaptation: Exploring Affect’s Role in Cognitive Load when Using a Literacy Game. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642150

2025
Get citation
Dalfidan, D. & Gündüz, T. (2025). The effect of cognitive emotional states on physiological productivity. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207454.2025.2593393

2026
Get citation
RB, B., DF, F., & K, L. (2026). Cognitive load, affect, and regulatory strategies: a more integrated model.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1774619

Related receipts
Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8204 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work