Morphological constraints govern the attachment of the English -er affix

the verdict

SUPPORTED

the evidence backs this

Recorded sources

2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that morphological constraints govern the attachment of the English -er affix?

Yes. Morphological and positional constraints govern the usage and processing of the English -er affix, limiting its function to specific word-final environments.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 2 sources for, 0 against · Last checked 4 Aug 2026

The analysis

The retrieved literature (specifically papers [10] and [11]) directly addresses the positional and morphological constraints on English affixes, noting that the -er suffix is constrained by its word-final position to convey meaning. No papers refute the claim.

Evidence for · 2

Evidence for Morpheme Transposition Effects in Developing Readers

2026

The study notes that the suffix -er conveys meaning specifically in its typical final location (e.g., reader) but not at word onsets (e.g., error), illustrating positional constraints.

Get citation

J, S., E, B., & H, K. (2026). Evidence for Morpheme Transposition Effects in Developing Readers. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/myz7d_v1

See more details

More for · 1

The bestersell effect: Nuances in positional encoding of morphemes in visual word recognition.

2025

The study discusses the positional encoding constraints imposed on affixes like -er, noting that while there are nuances in complex words, constraints strictly govern their typical locations.

Get citation

J, S., H, K., & E, B. (2025). The bestersell effect: Nuances in positional encoding of morphemes in visual word recognition.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-025-02693-7

Related receipts

Is it true that the egocentric constraint governs human language comprehension and perspective-taking? CONTESTED PARTIAL related question, same topic

Receipt History

first checked04 Aug 2026

judged → SUPPORTED · 7504 Aug 2026

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: request a receipt review Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work