trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Men have a higher pain tolerance than women

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that men have a higher pain tolerance than women?

Yes. Recent meta-analytic evidence indicates that males exhibit significantly higher pain thresholds and tolerances compared to females, with biological factors such as testosterone levels playing a contributing role.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 2 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

Paper [2] provides direct, high-level meta-analytic evidence showing that males have significantly higher pain thresholds and tolerances than females. Paper [5] supports the biological plausibility of this difference by demonstrating that testosterone has an antinociceptive effect, correlating positively with pain tolerance in men. Papers [1] and [3] also identify female sex as a predictor of higher pain sensitivity or symptom severity in specific contexts. No papers in the provided set refute the claim.

Evidence for · 2
2026
A comprehensive meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies found that males have significantly higher pain thresholds and higher pain tolerances than females.
Get citation
TA, G., O, O., J, O., & NJ, S. (2026). A Meta-Analysis of Sex Differences in Pain Threshold, Tolerance, and Intensity.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2026.02.008

See more details
More for · 1
2026
An experimental study on testosterone and pain perception found that lower testosterone levels in men are associated with reduced pain tolerance, supporting an antinociceptive role of testosterone that contributes to sex differences in pain.
Get citation
M, V., M, B., F, l. B., C, P., I, G., G, L., & S, M. (2026). Exploring the Influence of Testosterone on Pain Perception and Modulation Among Men with Low and Normal Testosterone Concentrations.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.s571741

Related receipts
Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7504 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work