trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Materialism understands affect as a physical and bodily process.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that materialism understands affect as a physical and bodily process?

Yes. Materialist scholarship in the retrieved literature conceptualizes affect as an embodied, physical process grounded in material relations and bodily experiences.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 2 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim states that materialism understands affect as a physical and bodily process. Papers [3] and [8] explicitly adopt new materialist or neomaterialist frameworks that analyze affect through bodily, somatic, and material practices. The remaining papers do not directly contradict this perspective, making SUPPORTED the appropriate verdict.

Evidence for · 2
The critical (micro)political economy of health: A more-than-human approach.
2024
The paper uses a new materialist framework to examine affect as something acting directly upon bodies and material relations within everyday events.
Get citation
NJ, F. (2024). The critical (micro)political economy of health: A more-than-human approach.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593221113212

See more details
More for · 1
Body-Mapping the Affective Politics of Bariatric Surgery.
2026
The study employs a neomaterialist framework and body-mapping to investigate somatic, embodied, and affective elements of human experience.
Get citation
M, B. & C, R. (2026). Body-Mapping the Affective Politics of Bariatric Surgery.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1177/19408447251334614

Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7904 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work