✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Leontief and Cobb-Douglas production functions are limiting cases of the constant elasticity of substitution function.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says
Is it true that Leontief and Cobb-Douglas production functions are limiting cases of the constant elasticity of substitution function?
Yes. Economic literature confirms that both the Leontief and Cobb-Douglas production functions are special or limiting cases of the constant elasticity of substitution (CES) production function.
Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked
How claims like this are judged
Judged against reference works: claims of this kind are settled by reference works, not journal abstracts.
Evidence for · 3
Reference article covering this claim directly
Get citation
Wikipedia: Constant elasticity of substitution. (n.d.). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constant_elasticity_of_substitution
See more details
More for · 2
Reference article covering this claim directly
Get citation
Wikipedia: Cobb–Douglas production function. (n.d.). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cobb%E2%80%93Douglas_production_function
Reference article covering this claim directly
Get citation
Wikipedia: Leontief production function. (n.d.). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leontief_production_function
Related receipts
- Is it true that there is empirical evidence supporting the usability of the Cobb-Douglas production function? SUPPORTED
- Is it true that Cobb-Douglas production functions can be formulated using expenditures rather than physical units? SUPPORTED
- Is it true that GDP growth is calculated using capital and labor elasticities in the Cobb-Douglas production function? SUPPORTED
- Is it true that empirical measurements exist for consumption and production elasticity of substitution? SUPPORTED
- Is it true that Cobb-Douglas preferences are homothetic? COMMON KNOWLEDGE
Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7504 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any
personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check
or guarantee a response time.
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work