trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Large author lists on scientific papers reflect contributions from massive research collaborations.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against

Evidence from bibliometric and scientometric analyses confirms that the trend toward larger author lists on scientific papers is largely driven by expansive national and international research collaborations.

Evidence for · 2
2017 · cited by 27
This study notes that contemporary biomedical research is performed by increasingly large teams, leading to a greater number of individuals listed as authors in bylines.
See more details
The analysis

The claim posits that large author lists reflect contributions from massive research collaborations. Papers [2] and [6] specifically examine authorship trends and collaborative team sizes, demonstrating that growing author bylines are associated with larger team sizes, multi-author contributions, and international collaborations. Thus, the available evidence clearly supports the claim.

More for · 1
2023 · cited by 4
This study finds that author teams generally become larger and more international as collaboration expands.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8404 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt