trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Large author lists on scientific papers reflect contributions from massive research collaborations.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that large author lists on scientific papers reflect contributions from massive research collaborations?

Yes. Evidence from bibliometric and scientometric analyses confirms that the trend toward larger author lists on scientific papers is largely driven by expansive national and international research collaborations.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 2 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim posits that large author lists reflect contributions from massive research collaborations. Papers [2] and [6] specifically examine authorship trends and collaborative team sizes, demonstrating that growing author bylines are associated with larger team sizes, multi-author contributions, and international collaborations. Thus, the available evidence clearly supports the claim.

Evidence for · 2
2017
This study notes that contemporary biomedical research is performed by increasingly large teams, leading to a greater number of individuals listed as authors in bylines.
Get citation
P, M., E, S., B, J., & V, L. (2017). The rise of the middle author: Investigating collaboration and division of labor in biomedical research using partial alphabetical authorship.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184601

See more details
More for · 1
2023
This study finds that author teams generally become larger and more international as collaboration expands.
Get citation
Sommer, D. & Tunger, D. (2023). Does scientific collaboration pay off? A novel bibliometrics study of the impact of international collaboration on scientific publications over time. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3233/isu-220173

Related receipts
Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8404 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work