trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Languages use by-phrases and oblique case marking to re-introduce the subject of a passive construction.

the verdict
COMMON KNOWLEDGE
Legacy classification; evidence review pending
Recorded sources
no sources on either side

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that languages use by-phrases and oblique case marking to re-introduce the subject of a passive construction?

The claim describes a standard linguistic definition of how passive constructions function in many languages, making it common knowledge that requires no formal citation.

Verdict: COMMON KNOWLEDGE · 0 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim that languages use by-phrases and oblique case marking to re-introduce the agent of a passive construction is a foundational grammatical fact taught in basic linguistics. Therefore, it is categorized as common knowledge requiring no specific paper citations.

What does the evidence say?

The claim that languages use by-phrases and oblique case marking to re-introduce the agent of a passive construction is a foundational grammatical fact taught in basic linguistics. Therefore, it is categorized as common knowledge requiring no specific paper citations.

Receipt History
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → COMMON KNOWLEDGE · 9505 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work